Following almost destroying the world, our families are allies’: the thrilling audio series featuring JFK and Khrushchev’s relatives.

In October 1962, humanity veered closer to ruin than at any other point in recent history. This occurred after a US surveillance aircraft identified that Russian atomic weapon installations were being assembled in Cuba, a mere 160 kilometers off the coast of the US mainland. In response, U.S. President John F Kennedy directed the US Navy’s Sixth Fleet to establish a maritime quarantine around the island. The next phase constituted almost 14 days filled with extreme anxiety.

The Unthinkable Danger

The peril remained clear. If President Kennedy, or his Soviet counterpart, Premier Khrushchev, initiated an attack on their enemy, a chain reaction of global nuclear strikes and counterstrikes might have followed, plunging civilization into total oblivion.

This pivotal 1962 event has been covered extensively, in books, films, as well as TV documentaries. However, in its latest installment, the audio documentary series titled "The Bomb" presents a completely new perspective into this historical narrative. It is jointly hosted by Max Kennedy alongside Nina Khrushcheva, relatives belonging to the men who, for 13 days, controlled the destiny of humanity in their hands.

"What were the Soviet side considering? What were the American side considering?" ponders Nina Khrushcheva, Khrushchev’s descendant and an academic of international affairs.

For her, the beauty of the podcast lies in its attempt to question: "How can people detest each other and confront each other?"

"It was not lost on me how remarkable the fact that people can be friends or else can become complete enemies," states Max Kennedy, son of RFK, nephew of the late president and currently an author as well as lawyer. "We see this repeatedly in instances where countries enter into conflict, demonstrating the profound irrationality involved to engage in warfare."

The Precipice Towards Disaster

What is striking regarding the Cuban missile crisis is that, because it transpired so publicly, individuals worldwide were able to observe almost in real time as it edged towards disaster. However, the threat of annihilation came closer than what most people realised.

"The overwhelming majority among Kennedy's advisors were advocating for an airstrike and a ground invasion," says Kennedy. "Had the U.S. attacked Cuba with the naval blockade, it is certain the Russians stationed there would have launched a tactical nuclear weapon at the US Sixth Fleet, and that would've destroyed our aircraft carriers and destroyed America's primary fleet. In turn, the U.S. would have retaliated through an overwhelming counterattack which would have ended all life on Earth."

The reality this did not occur is a testament to both leaders, who succeeded in exercise restraint and engaging in diplomacy when many advisors around them were advocating action. As a result, The Soviet premier agreed to withdraw the nuclear weapons in Cuba while Kennedy (a fact not publicly disclosed at the time) removed his similar weapons based in Turkey. The relief was palpable, as was a feeling of optimism.

A Divergent Viewpoint

Still, for those two weeks of October 1962, the anxiety was palpable by everyone. The podcast's co-hosts were born in the years following these events, with Nina being taught about the crisis via the USSR's school curriculum, which portrayed a slightly different version of events.

"You said your parent recalls it, describing it as a scary time," Khrushcheva notes. "But in the Soviet Union, people were largely unaware that much about it, since it was a tense situation, and in the Soviet Union the official line was that things are always wonderful and positive."

Inside the Khrushchev household, however, it was distinct. "I was informed that it was a triumphant moment for the USSR, as it represented a direct confrontation. They were able to find a solution, thus didn’t start the war, seen as a wonderful thing," she adds. Later on, however, that interpretation would not be shared by everybody. "For decades in Russian politics, the crisis was viewed as a defeat for Khrushchev, simply he didn’t blow up the United States."

An Unprecedented Partnership

The Bomb is so even-handed , expertly crafted that Nina jokes she nearly forgot the known outcome. This is, partly, thanks to contributions from renowned scholars. Yet, really, the most significant thing is the participation of the hosts themselves. Even within living memory, it was unthinkable for relatives of the heads of state of America and USSR would appear side by side. The fact that Max Kennedy and Nina Khrushcheva are able to do so, and exhibit such warmth toward one another, must be seen as a sign of optimism.

"We are not the pioneers," smiles Nina. "Following the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, a relative Sergey Khrushchev’s son and became great friends with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."

"But we were strangers prior to this project," adds Max. "Which is unfortunate because we got along immediately and now we’re friends, something that is wonderful. Finally, after almost 60 years of nearly annihilating the world, our lineages have become friends, suggesting global relations is more secure, somewhat."

Modern Parallels with Current Dangers

Is that truly the case? One reason the reason this series seems so urgent is because we now find ourselves in dark times. The symbolic clock of doom stands nearer to catastrophe than ever before, in part because today's statesmen don’t seem to be able to grasp

Tracey Cline
Tracey Cline

Astrophysicist and science communicator passionate about making space accessible through engaging content and research.